Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the genesis domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/harborbay/stage.harbortothebay.org/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the infinity-pro domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/harborbay/stage.harbortothebay.org/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
Harbor to the Bay https://stage.harbortothebay.org An AIDS Benefit Bike Ride Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:58:30 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://stage.harbortothebay.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/cropped-21profile-32x32.jpg Harbor to the Bay https://stage.harbortothebay.org 32 32 Superfan Post: The National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center https://stage.harbortothebay.org/superfan-post-the-national-lgbtqia-health-education-center/ Wed, 01 Jun 2022 13:17:53 +0000 https://stage.harbortothebay.org/superfan-post-the-national-lgbtqia-health-education-center/  (artistic interpretation of me at every ed. div. event)

The National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center is the Bees Knees.

Do you guys know about this place yet?  I mean – I’m assuming as soon as I first mentioned it, everyone went to the website immediately and was BLOWN AWAY.  But – in case you  [ … Read More →]]]>  (artistic interpretation of me at every ed. div. event)

The National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center is the Bees Knees.

Do you guys know about this place yet?  I mean – I’m assuming as soon as I first mentioned it, everyone went to the website immediately and was BLOWN AWAY.  But – in case you haven’t had a chance yet, let me summarize what’s been missing from your life:

Timely, beautifully produced, and profound educational content on LGBTQIA+ health, care, and community competency.  TOTALLY FREE.

OK – totally free is a bit of a misstatement.

One: it definitely costs to make this content, in money, labor, and skill (thank you, grantors, donors, and other benefactors!);

Two: they absolutely DO offer tailored programs and materials on a fee for service model if you need something specific to a particular audience or a deeper dive into a particular topic or an expert speaker.

Three: They put on exceptional conferences, featuring deeply compelling topics and presented by luminaries in the field (I mean – they ARE education focused, and they do it well), and you DO have to pay to attend those (unless you qualify for scholarship).

Whew – caveats finished.  Otherwise – seriously, just register on the site and check out the library of TOTALLY FREE resources.  What a gift to the community!  For my two cents, this is what walking the talk looks like, making sure that anyone in healthcare can access best practices and crucial information from anywhere at any time.  Want to watch a video that will change your perspective on healthcare?  Also – I turn into Will Ferrell in Elf every time I see someone I know on screen. “SANTA!? I KNOW him!!!”

]]>
Situational (not intrinsic!) Vulnerability – and Why it Matters in Research https://stage.harbortothebay.org/situational-not-intrinsic-vulnerability-and-why-it-matters-in-research/ Mon, 23 May 2022 15:47:18 +0000 https://stage.harbortothebay.org/situational-not-intrinsic-vulnerability-and-why-it-matters-in-research/ On May 11, the incomparable Alma Castro of Harvard Business School (her brain absolutely crushes) and I had the pleasure of presenting a workshop to SOCRA (the Society for Clinical Research Professionals) on risk in social, behavioral, and educational research (SBER).  The workshop centered on a case study we wrote with TFI’s own  [ … Read More →]]]> On May 11, the incomparable Alma Castro of Harvard Business School (her brain absolutely crushes) and I had the pleasure of presenting a workshop to SOCRA (the Society for Clinical Research Professionals) on risk in social, behavioral, and educational research (SBER).  The workshop centered on a case study we wrote with TFI’s own Natalie Marks for the Harvard Catalyst (it’s not in the case study library yet – we’re saving it for our forthcoming book, stay tuned).  Harvard Catalyst has a Regulatory Foundations, Ethics, and Law subcommittee on SBER that we’re a part of – but I digress.  The case study focuses on situational vulnerability of trans research participants (like I said –always pushing that queer research agenda, and Alma is HERE FOR IT).

One of our big jobs at TFI (in addition to conducting research to inform equitable policy and transform the health/life of LGBTQIA+ folks in Boston and far far beyond) is to train the next generation of researchers and to help the research community as a whole do better when it comes to understanding the interests, needs, strengths, and risks faced by the LGBTQIA+ community.  Enter a VERY useful concept: Situational Vulnerability.

When ethics boards look at a study plan and try to decide if it appropriate/acceptable (i.e., ethical), a major task is to assess if the potential benefits of the research outweigh the risks to participants. The human research subject protection regulations name certain categories of people as vulnerable (problematic, we know).  Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Gender are not among those categories.  HOWEVER, we know LGBTQIA+ folks may be more susceptible to certain risks, or more vulnerable to harm due to due to socio-political factors beyond the control of any single institution or researcher.  Therefore, it’s not enough to just consider the risks and benefits of a study in vacuum – we have to consider them in context, and think about the participant population that investigators are seeking to enroll or are likely to encounter.

Thinking through “situational vulnerability” is a way to consider these vulnerabilities caused by the research context and exacerbated by position in society.  LGBTQIA+ people may have a limited field of options because of circumstance (for example, only able to obtain community competent care in certain states, and within those states, only at certain facilities).  What makes this concept so useful (in my opinion) is that it does not imply any impairment in the ability to make choices among limited options or advocate for their own interests – but rather focuses the susceptibility to risk of harm posed by research or vulnerability to additional risk.  It gives us a framework in which to consider the impacts of minority stress. Researchers need to think about these things when designing studies, and ethics boards when reviewing them!

We had an outstanding discussion with a group of about 50 research professionals – they were really able to deeply interrogate how what appeared to be a study with very little risk had the potential to harm trans participants and the trans community. We GOT INTO IT.  I love this kind of outreach.

]]>
My Fenway Story https://stage.harbortothebay.org/my-fenway-story/ Mon, 16 May 2022 14:32:37 +0000 https://stage.harbortothebay.org/my-fenway-story/

Full disclosure – I work in compliance.  It’s not the sexiest work – a lot of T crossing and I dotting – but the foundation of what I do is ethics; specifically, research ethics. A good chunk of my day is spent reading through the studies that researchers have planned, thinking about risk and  [ … Read More →]]]>

Full disclosure – I work in compliance.  It’s not the sexiest work – a lot of T crossing and I dotting – but the foundation of what I do is ethics; specifically, research ethics. A good chunk of my day is spent reading through the studies that researchers have planned, thinking about risk and benefit, thinking about justice, community, and unintended consequences.  I guess that’s maybe a little sexy.

I work in Fenway Health’s research department, The Fenway Institute (TFI). I was recently tasked with helping to clean out some of our long-term file storage. Thirty plus years of “we might need this”a; “do I need to keep this?”; and “I’ll deal with this later.” It included research etcetera since before there was a TFI. As the person-in-charge of our research document retention policy, I was given the power to say “we’ll never need this”; “we are not legally required to keep this”; and “I’ll deal with this now.”

Research at Fenway Health has an incredible history. It was not born of some huge endowment to a university or prestigious hospital. It began when a tiny student-run health clinic that served a lot of gay men realized it needed to confront a pandemic. I’m sure there were detractors – people who wondered why a small facility staffed mainly by volunteers wanted to provide experimental treatments and ultimately conduct HIV research – but those trying to survive in the chaos of those early days understood even then what would become public health doctrine. Commitment to community is essential to building trust. Connection to community is fundamental to understanding need. Because of this, Fenway Community Health Center was the IDEAL place to conduct HIV/AIDS research. This work, born of necessity, transformed Fenway into a world-class research destination, and in 2001, The Fenway Institute was founded.

But back to those files – those mountains of paper growing old in long-term storage.

In compliance speak – they were all non-essential, non-source documents, no identifiable patient or participant data. Instead, it was a lot of the day-to-day detritus of research administration: strategy notes; Call logs; Request letters; Early drafts; Mailing labels; Warning labels; Flyers. That’s all to say, it was wildly compelling.

I saw extra copies of letters from sponsoring pharmaceutical companies letting Fenway know that a trial was closing due to inefficacy. That seems so mundane – a letter from a sponsor. But what I read wasn’t on the page – I was reading the dashing of hopes, the endless hours of work, the awful calls that volunteers had to make to each participant. “Thank you for your participation. They reviewed the preliminary data. It’s not helping. They are stopping the trial.”

I read the notes of Fenway’s early research ethics review board. How should a research ethicist weigh risk and benefit for a population clamoring for any chance at life when facing what was an almost universally fatal disease? What risk would I and my board have deemed too great? What side-effect too harsh?

I saw descriptions of cutting-edge treatments for debilitating opportunistic infections, some which went nowhere and some which bought participants precious days, months, or even years. Reading these totally dry administrative files was….devastating.

But, I then got to watch something wonderful happen. Drugs getting through Phase II (seems to work well enough for large scale trials) and then Phase III (large scale clinical trials). Drugs getting approved! Suddenly (for me – years of meticulous work for the research teams), we were looking at non-inferiority! We weren’t looking for just ANY treatment – but if this new treatment would work BETTER. And then, hallelujah, studies on medication to prevent infection, both before and after exposure. Participants with good long-term outcomes, studies not looking only at survival but long-term quality of life. Vaccine research! Pregnancy! Exercise! Smoking! Old age!

As a lifelong AIDS activist, it’s hard to express what it meant to me to follow that paper trail into the past, back to what our fearless leader refers to as “the bad old days” and back again.  Those numbers on the page were lives – so many lost, and then so many saved.

But what am I trying to tell you? I want you to know that TFI is special and the work we do today comes from a profound history of struggle and strength. Today, we work at a world class research, evaluation, training, education, policy and advocacy center dedicated to optimizing health and well-being for sexual and gender minorities and those affected by HIV. Honestly, I’m sure I missed a couple of key verbs – the scope of the incredible work now done at TFI is truly mind-boggling. The luminary faculty are committed to addressing the needs of our diverse LGBTQIA+ community from birth through end of life. They train the next generation of researchers focused on the needs of the LGBTQIA+ community and people living with HIV. Each day is just an incremental step, but what a gift to be able to support transformative work, work that strives to heal this broken world.

Me and my tiny but mighty compliance team? We help keep everyone accountable.  Let me assure you, it’s my great honor.  And TFI-ers?  Take good notes and, for the love of all that’s holy, please label your files!

Want to learn more about the history of Fenway Health?

Mission & History

Want to learn more about early trials? Take a trip in this time machine. Fenway participated in the aerosolized pentamidine trial.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1988/11/28/drug-bringing-hope-time-to-aids-patients/372d7f30-e8e1-4b37-ab73-32c142e51b7b/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/612418

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-06-20-tm-10183-story.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234129/

 

Recent groundbreaking studies where TFI was a site that are changing the face of HIV prevention:

https://www.avac.org/trial/ipergay

https://www.aidsmap.com/news/mar-2022/study-shows-biktarvy-pep-has-fewer-side-effects-and-better-completion-rates

https://www.hptn.org/research/studies/hptn083

]]>